Answer:
There were a number of pressing issues debated during the presidential campaign. The major foreign policy debate revolved around the appropriate American response to the French Revolution. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans were sympathetic to France, while the Federalists leaned more toward Britain, fearing the growing radicalism of the French Revolution and attempting to prevent the United States from being drawn into the conflict. The Federalist party’s pro-British stance led to accusations that Adams and his compatriots were seeking to undo the political effects of the American Revolution and restore the monarchy.The Alien and Sedition Acts, which John Adams had signed into law in 1798, were another point of contention. The acts made it more difficult for immigrants to become US citizens, and included a provision criminalizing false statements critical of the federal government. This provision was squarely aimed at the Democratic-Republican opposition, which had been sharply critical of Adams and the Federalists. Critics of the Alien and Sedition Acts, many of them Democratic-Republicans, charged that they were unconstitutional and violated the First Amendment right to free speech. While the Democratic-Republicans were well-organized and effective, the Federalist party suffered from a split between John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton penned a 54-page letter denouncing Adams, and it hurt the Federalist cause when it was published after falling into the hands of a Democratic-Republican. The campaigns were bitter and divisive, with both sides launching heated accusations, vilifying each other, and engaging in slander and character assassination. Adams and Jefferson, former friends and compatriots, had become bitter enemies.
Explanation:
China is the oldest LIVING civilization in the world.
<span>When can the government exercise prior restraint on the press?</span>
Uhh... when they tell classified information or that may cause violence.<span />
Hi there!
Some of the indicators of the indicators to measure an economic growth of a country are the following options: Measuring how much the economy produces, studying the economy of another country, and tracking the unemployment rate.
Argument:
Economists and stadisticians use different methods to track economic growth. These need to be the most precise ones, to keep the metrics and its statistics right on track. For the first option selected "Measuring how much the economy produces" is what they consider as production and spending, the relationship among these two actions in marketing is quite a debate in economics. When they measure how much is the production within a specific country sector (like industry, agriculture or services), they know exactly what is the one that is giving more earnings to the country. Consequently, they will know the total spending produced by that product's output in the market.
The second option "Studying the economy of another country" is just an option inside the economic growth measurements, because the fact of looking to another country's economy does not assure that your country's economy will arise, but it will help you to develop ideas and strategies to raise it up.
And finally, the third option "Tracking the unemployment rate", is one of the most inexplicable measurements within the economic growth, because reducing this rate does not always equal positive economic growth. But it most be considered inside the options to measure in because sometimes the productivity and wealth of a country's citizens is arguably the ultimate determiner of economic success.