This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read:
A Mom Sues Nutella Maker For Deceptive Advertising
By Whitney Blair Wyckoff
Which statement is not Whitney Blair Wycoff's point of view about suing
Nutella in her article?
O A) Nutella is not a nutritional substitute.
B) We want to hold foodmakers accountable.
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
O D) How could a mom mistake Nutella for health food?
Answer:
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
Explanation:
Wyckoff´s remark about how something that tastes so good could be healthy is only a rhetorical question aimed to emphasize how ridiculous it was for her to believe that Nutella was a healthy snack, not her point of view on the topic.
She does claim that Nutella is not a nutritional substitute, and she does mention the objective of holding food makers accountable which can be understood as a kind of support for that idea. And she also questions Athena Hohenberg for mistaking Nutella for healthy food.
Is there anything else that goes with this question?
It sounds like the narrator could be the mother of the two girls based on how she was describing Maggie in the first paragraph. I hope this helps
Answer:
The aunt is pleased with the bachelor's story because it entertains the children, but disapproves of the story's message.
Explanation:
I took the test.
A simple subject is the thing doing the verb, but excluding any extra details about the subject.
In this case, the subjects would be “men and melons”.
A simple predicate is just the verb, instead of the entire verb phrase.
In this case, the verb would be “are”.
