I personally think B is correct because it overall sums up what is being suggested in the paragraph
Answer:
<u>ENGLISH-</u> When given an analogy such as ink:pen, you would read it, "Ink is to pen." If you are given an analogy such as ink : pen : : milk : cow, it would be read "Ink is to pen as milk is to cow."
<u>SPANISH-</u> Cuando se le da una analogía como tinta: bolígrafo, lo leería, "La tinta es un bolígrafo". Si se le da una analogía como tinta: pluma:: leche: vaca, se leería "La tinta es la pluma como la leche es la vaca".
<u>GERMAN-</u> Wenn Sie eine Analogie wie Tinte: Stift erhalten, lesen Sie sie: "Tinte ist Stift". Wenn Sie eine Analogie wie Tinte: Stift :: Milch: Kuh erhalten, würde dies lauten: "Tinte ist zu Stift wie Milch zu Kuh."
It would be simple. The past word of stand would be stood.
Answer:
The correct answer is that an argumentative essay does not use emotions.
For instance, "an argumentative essay is based on logic and reasons while a persuasive essay is based on emotions and personal opinions".
Evidently, the statement proves how argumentative essay use logic and reasoning, whereas a persuasive essay uses emotions to prove the point to the reader.
However, all of the other options are correct because both types of essays are trying to make the reader believe a certain point.
