Answer:
Write a story about something easy, something that you're familiar with. It's better to submit something late that you wrote yourself than risk getting in trouble.
Here are some example sentences:
"Merry Christmas!" said Mr. Doug, our next door neighbor.
This Christmas was the best so far. At first, I was hesitant to go on a family trip, but soon enough, I forgot about all that I had left behind.
I smiled and watched from afar. It would be a Christmas miracle if he noticed me.
Good luck!
Answer:
bru
Explanation:
You need to provide context
The inference that can be made about the culture of the setting that is supported by the passage is Students whose first language is not English face discrimination.
<h3>What inference can be made about the culture?</h3><h3 />
The excerpt is not attached but an inference can be made based on the given options.
Culture refers to social methods of doing things in a society. This means that the only two options related to culture are options A and C.
As boys and girls are allowed to take classes together in most places in the world, the more likely cultural setting is that students are discriminated against is their first language is not English.
Find out more on discrimination at brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.
<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.
<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.
Explanation:
The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.
The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.
The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.
