Answer:
The Additional states sucede after the battle of fort summer because they have fears that slavery will stop in there states and it will distrup the business or affects the Economies of there states negatively
Explanation:
When Abraham Lincoln was elected into the office of the president, some states in the south fears that he might end slavely, so they sucede but not all of the southern states suceded, about four states in the south still remain in the United States of America which was popular called back then as the UNION .This four states taught the President will not end slavely at first but after the battle of fort Summer, they realize that the slavely will be abolished. So they join the first group of seven states that earlier declared Independence from the UNION
Answer:
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War.
The correct answer is:
Passionate and logical.
The Founding Fathers, wrote the Declaration of Independence. This document was logical, yet not intellectual. Passionate, yet not personal. It was very simple. Well thought out, but simple. It was constructed that way so that even simple minded could understand. It was logical in all it's aspects. For instance, the text states, "whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government."
Answer:
Barter (or Bartering)
Explanation:
Bartering is the exchange of goods and services between two or more parties without the use of money. It is the oldest form of commerce. Individuals and companies barter goods and services between each other based on equivalent estimates of prices and goods.
Supporters of the youthful dissidents saluted the Court choice that "understudies are qualified for opportunity of articulation of their
sees." Critics who contradicted the wearing of the armbands anticipated hurtful outcomes.
Equity Hugo Black disagreed from the dominant part assessment. He recommended that the Court's choice was "the start of a
new progressive time of tolerance in this nation encouraged by the legal." He contended that nobody has a total
appropriate to the right to speak freely and articulation.
Later choices, for example,
Bethel School District
v.
Fraser
(1986) and
Hazelwood School District
v.
Kuhlmeier
(1988),
limited
understudies' First Amendment rights. These
decisions by their inclination likewise extended the specialist of school authorities.
