Answer:
D
Explanation:
I know this off the top of my head
Ruling out rival hypotheses, Findings consistent with several hypotheses
require additional research to eliminate these hypotheses. More five principles
of critical thinking are: (1.) Correlation vs. Causation, the fact that two
things are associated with each other doesn’t mean that one causes the other.
(2.) Replicability, a finding must be capable of being duplicated by
independent researchers following the same recipe. (3.) Occam’s Razor,
if two hypotheses explain a phenomenon equally well, we should generally select
the simpler one. (4.) Falsifiability, claims
must be capable of being disproved. (5.) Extraordinary Claims, the more a
claim contradicts what we already know, the more persuasive the evidence must
be before we should accept it.
Answer:
By nobody.
Explanation:
If a state law contradicts or violates what is stipulated by the US Constitution, it´s simply unconstitutional, it´s unviable. It will surely be objected in court , and if it makes it to the Supreme Court, it´ll surely be overturned.
No, Washington cannot be taken as a realistic model to judge American President in today's world.
Explanation
When Washington took the chair of the president, the country was in chaos.
He was the first president in office. His contributions to the country and its welfare has made America excel in all fields strategically.
Today the problems, the current American president faces is different from the past.
Moreover expectations of citizens have increased from time to time.
The President of America is something the citizens look into when they face adversity.
