Answer: This argument has Some merits but it also has some logical errors that undermines its reasoning and conclusion.
Explanation:
(1) IT FAILED TO GIVE THE TOTAL POPULATION OF WORKERS FROM WHERE THE SAMPLE(1200 PEOPLE) WERE DERIVED AND WHAT SAMPLING METHOD WAS USED: This is a logical error, sampling has to be in RELATION TO THE POPULATION.The sampling method should have been defined.Samples may have been taken from a given A CLASS OF WORKERS.
(2) IT SHOULD HAVE GIVEN CLEARER AND OTHER CHOICES RELATED TO MANAGEMENT ISSUES: It should have made more choices of questions about management issues so that a BROAD, ELABORATE, REASONABLE,ACCURATE AND CONVINCING conclusion will be arrived at.
It will follow a general noun and is not set off by commas is true regarding a restrictive adjectival clause. Since this clause is restrictive, it means it is essential for the meaning of the noun and cannot be excluded.
The answer is B, kiki has to decide wether to turn mya in or turn a blind eye.
Answer:
the answer is an eccentric scientist
Answer:
The purpose is to inform us about the advances our world is having in space, it also gives us commentary about what is happening in the very moment the first man walks on the moon. All the texts are very effective in informing us about what is going on at he time. The first one has good ethos because you can see it from The Times which is a highly trusted source. Second on has good pathos, it tells us how they had to breath through oxygen tanks for many hours and kind of makes you feel bad for them.
Explanation:
100% edge 2020
