A historian wants to learn more about a World War II battle. He studies diaries written by soldiers who participated in the batt
le, film taken during the battle itself, and photographs of the area before and after the battle. He uses the information from these sources to reach a conclusion that wouldn't have been possible by analyzing only one of them. Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?
This historian would be using the skill of "comparative analysis," since he or she is comparing a wide variety of sources to draw a conclusion between them as a group.
The correct answer is “analyzing historical sources and evidence.”
<em>The historical thinking skill that the historian is using its research is “analyzing historical sources and evidence.
</em>
This technique helps the historian to analyze primary and secondary sources. The historian selects, describes, and evaluates primary resources such as the diaries written by soldiers that participated in the battle. This primary source is very important and legit as part of its research. The historian can also make connections when the film material and the photographs taken at that time in order to make its conclusions.
I believe the answer is: The world depended on Kuwait for oil.
At that time, Kuwait exported more than $ 100 Billion worth of oil to countries all over the world. The Coalition believe that If Iraq managed to get their hand of Kuwait's resource, the rest of the world would be in oil shortage. So they decided to intervene.
