Answer:
I) If method I is used, population of generalization will include all those people who may have varying exercising habits or routines. They may or may not have a regular excersing habit. In his case sample is taken from a more diverse population
II) Population of generalization will include people who will have similar excersing routines and habits if method II is used since sample is choosen from a specific population
Step-by-step explanation:
past excercising habits may affect the change in intensity to a targeted excersise in different manner. So in method I a greater diversity is included and result of excersing with or without a trainer will account for greater number of variables than method II.
Since molly's solution tally's with the given solution, hence <em>Molly's solution is correct.</em>
Given the working on a partial product of 93 and 51 carried out by Molly as shown:
This partial product can also be solved as shown below:
Applying the distributive law:
Since molly's solution tally's with the given solution, hence <em>Molly solution is correct.</em>
Learn more about partial product at: brainly.com/question/24716925
To prove a similarity of a triangle, we use angles or sides.
In this case we use angles to prove
∠ACB = ∠AED (Corresponding ∠s)
∠AED = ∠FDE (Alternate ∠s)
∠ABC = ∠ADE (Corresponding ∠s)
∠ADE = ∠FED (Alternate ∠s)
∠BAC = ∠EFD (sum of ∠s in a triangle)
Now we know the similarity in the triangles.
But it is necessary to write the similar triangle according to how the question ask.
The question asks " ∆ABC is similar to ∆____. " So we find ∠ABC in the prove.
∠ABC corressponds to ∠FED as stated above.
∴ ∆ABC is similar to ∆FED
Similarly, if the question asks " ∆ACB is similar to ∆____. "
We answer as ∆ACB is similar to ∆FDE.
Answer is ∆ABC is similar to ∆FED.
Using similarity principle, the height of the tree is 1.97 meters
<h3>How to find height of the tree?</h3>
He is 1.75 meters tall.
His shadow = 33.7 meters
The length of the tree shadows = 37.95 meters
Using similarity principles where the corresponding length are a ratio of each other.
Therefore,
1.75 / x = 33.7 / 37.95
cross multiply
37.95 × 1.75 = 33.7x
66.4125 = 33.7x
divide both sides by 33.7
x = 66.4125 / 33.7
x = 1.97069732938
x = 1.97 meters
learn more on height here:brainly.com/question/27522065
#SPJ1
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
