1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nady [450]
3 years ago
5

Why didn’t the south go towards hiring people in the normal way instead of making them slaves

History
1 answer:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
8 0
It was cheaper to have slaves because you didn't have to pay them. Although, if you wanted a worker, many people wanted work
You might be interested in
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best summarizes how President Reagan’s economic policies affected the US economy?
Travka [436]

Answer:

D. There was a significant rise in prosperity but the federal spending and the national debt increase is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The economic policies promoted by president Reagan is known as Reaganomics.  His policies are also known as supply side economics or voodoo economics, Reagan's political advocates called it free-market economics. The four pillars of his policies were Reduction of federal income tax, Capital gains tax, increasing government spending, reducing regulation and restricting money supply.

The outcomes of his policies are still debated, his supporters point out that the policies led to the end of stagflation, increase in GDP, while critics consider that  it led to difference in income gap and tripling of national debt.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rhythm of early notated music came from:
charle [14.2K]
The rhythm of early notated music came from: the notation. Option letter B is correct since it made the music change the whole world. Many music notes were changed and added due to the evolution of music and its accompaniment.
3 0
3 years ago
An economic theory that calls for workers to take control of factories is
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

communism

Explanation:

a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.See also Marxism.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not a democracy in 1919
Karolina [17]

Weimar Constitution adopted in Germany

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At which of the following wartime conferences did Roosevelt and Churchill discuss the Allied invasion of Italy?
    9·1 answer
  • The Persian Wars successfly united which two civilizations to fight off outside invasions from Persia
    12·2 answers
  • Why was Georgia willing to give land away and not sell it
    9·1 answer
  • I need help for #5, I want to make sure I’m correct
    7·1 answer
  • Graphic organizers help researchers to
    8·1 answer
  • Why did some members of the Borgia Family want to join the clergy?
    10·1 answer
  • Was germany in a position to block a british dream of building a railroad from the mediterranean sea
    6·1 answer
  • Los nombres de los mares que atraviesa Grecia
    8·1 answer
  • What was true of the Persian empire?
    6·2 answers
  • Who is least likely to be hurt by unanticipated inflation?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!