Raja was a strong leader who used to govern, whereas Dasa or Dasi are captive slaves who once served their lords. This is how the lives of the two groups differed. Raja is able to make sacrifices, unlike Dasa or Dasis.
A slave was not autonomous, although a raja was. Rajas enjoyed respect due to their position of authority. But in most instances, a slave must have drawn jeers and sympathy.
The rajas had no cities, palaces, armies, or tax collection systems. In general, sons did not always succeed their fathers as rajas.
Later, the word evolved to refer to a slave or dasa. Men and women who were taken during the war became slaves. They were treated as the owners' property, and the owners had the right to demand that they perform any tasks.
Learn more about life of raja:
brainly.com/question/779907
#SPJ4
Answer:
b) : | I guess not quite Sure
“states the claim or position it argues and presents a well-developed chain of evidence leading to a reasonable conclusion supporting the claim. “
Answer:
is the site working correctly ? i can't ask any questions
Explanation:
