Answer:
Finding connections to nature in cities is key to healthy urban living
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct solution is Option d (when rocks develop joints or fractures
).
Explanation:
- Porosity is observable from descriptive samples taken. The drawbacks of receivable dams are that this is impossible to make true reflection temperature measurements, specific side-wall concrete samples while being often valuable can also result in poor coverage as well as dependence on log-derived porosity seems to have become the standard.
- As porosity rises, too much wind needs to pass further through most of the shelterbelt, which would be to say the less significant decrease in wind direction.
Some other available scenarios have no connexons with the particular circumstance. So this seems to be a reasonable option.
The U.S. has more than 87,000 dams greater than six feet high (and two million overall). While many dams continue to provide benefits such as flood control, irrigation, and water supply, for other dams the cost of maintenance or the negative effects on communities, fish, and tribes justifies their removal.
Dam owners and regulators decide whether to remove a dam by weighing many factors including: the cost of removal and the ability to replace any lost power generation against avoided long-term maintenance; safety concerns; benefits to endangered fish populations; increased recreational and commercial fishing; and restoration of cultural values of nearby tribes.
By 2020, roughly 70% of dams will be more than 50 years old, inviting us to reconsider the value to the public of long-term investments in this infrastructure.
C. ice melting...
hope this helps!!
