He had to go look for a lot of info
Answer:
I would say yes because If we have plastic in the oceon,cutting down trees, killing animals. Then Future genarations won't be able to see the tigers elephants and the other animals that we have now. In order for humans to change is if we stop using plastic or just reuses clothes, plastic,shoes,paper.
Explanation:
Hi !!
The conclusion to Damian's argument is positive as he is aware of what the problem still is the second one ===>
-
EXPLANATION
<u>He cannot say</u><u> </u>:
1- it's absurd that we have this problem when there is such an easy solution, <em>because he wants things to change</em>
<u>He knows that </u>:
1- Unfortunately, more 100 million plastic grocery bags are still being thrown away every year.
2- Although attempts have been made to recycle these plastic bags, the problem cause by them still exists.
So it's conclusion is that we have to change ►
<u>We need</u> to take active steps and change <u>our habits</u> by using reusable bags instead.
hope this helps ☺☺☺
Answer:
Rhetorical device has almost the same meaning, but it's more broad: literary devices only are found in literature, rhetorical devices can occur in any sort of speech or writing. So all literary devices are rhetorical devices, but not all rhetorical devices are literary devices.
Explanation:
