QUESTION: Satish was standing on the balcony watching the last rays of the sun. Loud and angry voices below distracted his attention. He ran down the stairs to see what had happened. He seen a guy yelling at a lady that she had cheated. Satish seen the girl crying saying “I didn’t do it he’s just a friend” he yelled at her “I seen the messages why would you do that to me” she ran. Her husband went after her yelling that he’s going to take her to court and get lawyers. She begged him not to do this. Satiah quickly ran over to her and said if she needed anything she stated laughing and said “yes, a lawyer” he called his friend and helped her. 2 weeks pass by and she lost the case because In did she did cheat he took one of the kids Nd she took the other they both had to switch after a week. The end sorry if this isn’t good I love tea so I ofc had to add the tea
Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
Oral because they speak about things
Any thing u have to write or it Jus has to be about that
