The concept of limited government states the idea that the government and government officials are not above the law. So the correct option that matches the above statement is A.
Limited government refers that the law supersedes any authority, and only the lawmaker or Supreme Court has the sole authority to make changes in the law.
<h3>Rules of law</h3>
- It has been seen that there have been various cases that were filed on the government or on the working of the government offices like police authorities in which the government lost.
- The concept of limited government states that the law is above all the authorities, irrespective of their position in the democracy. If a criminal wrong is punishable, it will be punishable for all.
- Rule of law also states that no one including superior authorities like a President, Minister, central or state government is as good as a normal individual in the eyes of the law.
Hence, the correct option is A that the rule of Limited government states that the government and the government officials are not above the law.
To know more about Laws, refer to the link below.
brainly.com/question/6590381
The correct answer is the last one:They were beaten and fired from their jobs.
Fannie Lou Hamer was born in 1917 in Mississippi. She was a civil rights activist and strongly commited to the cause.She stood up for African Americans right to vote.
In 1964,Hamer helped coordinating a group which was in charge of providing assitance to African American people to register ion order to vote.
Hamer herself as anactivist was beaten,arrested , even fired from her job on the Marlow Plantation.In addition, she was also threatened and shot at as a consequence of the opposition of the all-white delegation.
The people of the Zhou Dynasty perceived natural disasters to be A) Indicative of their rulers not following the Mandate of Heaven. They believed that if the ruler was not being virtuous and right, that they would be punished. As a result, they often led revolts against the ruler who brought the floods and famine upon them.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
The Middle East is situated as a crossroads between Europe, Asia, & Africa
