Nabokov organized his essay in an exceedingly typical manner; he states his plan then uses proof to support it. He additionally explains his read on what makes a decent author initial then what makes a decent reader. This is smart as a result of one should initial perceive the author before understanding the reader. He uses samples of what created a decent author to clarify what would create a decent reader. “The writer is the initial man to mop it and to form the natural objects it contains (…) The panting and happy reader, and there they spontaneously embrace and are linked forever if the book lasts forever.” This possibly implies that a good author makes a cheerful reader. so a cheerful reader is one that has understood the piece clearly, creating them a good reader. author then offers his definition of literature before closing the essay, giving the reader that last little bit of information that wraps literature, the reader, and also the author all at once, “To the story teller we turn for entertainment, for mental excitement of the simplest kind, for emotional participation,for the pleasure of traveling in some remote region in space or time.”
I'm not sure if these are something you would put, but I would put.........
- Cool(ing)
- Refresh(ing)
- Like(ing) (probably not this one but I don't know any other word with (ing) at the end.)
The theme that best established the conflict in this passage is:
Advances in technology can lead to devastation.
In a way the author tries to explain that even with our incredible technological advances and superior knowledge, the gods can have the possibility of destroying themselves with nuclear weapons.
Answer:
nah
Explanation:
sadly she's a TYRANASURAUS REX
Answer:
Well one reason why they struggled was because the priest had higher authority than the king himself did but I don't really know why or how it lead to the crusades in the holy land. I'm sorry I couldn't help you fully but I tried.
Explanation:
