The term was derived from the phrase "to the victor belongs the <span>spoils</span>
Nobody chooses the rulers. If its through a system of heredity, when the rulers die their children take over.
Answer:
Explanation:
I think you really ought to become familiar with the civil rights movement, particularly if you are an American. The issue in the 60s began as an issue that centered around voting.
Let's start with the fact that in the 60s, there was no such thing as on line. Let's also begin by saying that in the 60s, when the colored went to register, they were asked "qualifying questions" that no one knew the answer to, probably not even the person asking them. Things like if you lived in Alabama you might be asked how many counties there were and what are they.
Think of why people might withhold the vote. The colored in many counties outnumbered the whites. They could elect sheriffs council members, judges, and any other elected official.
There are enough problems with voting without adding the need to see who was casting the ballot. Think of what can be done. You can set up an email address for six people and let all six vote.
Voting is a hard fought for right. People have died for it. It's worth a little bit of inconvenience to make sure it is as honest as it can be made.
Hi,
Pyramids were built for religious purposes. The Egyptians were one of the first civilizations to believe in an afterlife. They believed that a second self called the ka lived within every human being. When the physical body expired, the ka enjoyed eternal life.
Hope this helps
Election of public officials best exemplifies John Locke’s principle of consent of the governed.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Consent refers to the freedom of natural and legal rights. John Locke was a great philosopher of all time and especially famous for his work doctrine of rights. Locke claimed that men are free and they have the right to do their own actions without depending on the will of other men. But in the case of government, people will come to power and they cannot live without the will of the government.
So he argued the fact which the government can be officially legal only when the people decide them to be legitimate. Not every person will have the same consent about the government they are living under. Because of the benefits they experienced from the government. so he called this as tacit consent.
