1. Suzie's hypothesis (i.e. prediction of results) is that ferns which are placed in white light will grow to a taller height after two weeks than ferns which are placed in other coloured light or in a closet.
2. Her independent variable (the thing she changes to produce a result) is the kind of light that she places each plant in.
3. The dependent variable (the thing she measures) is the height of the plants after two weeks.
4. I would say her control group would be the plant placed in the closet, because every other group is exposed to some form of light.
5. I would say that Suzie has 4 experimental groups: white, red, blue, and green light.
6. The constant variables were the amount of water each plant was given, the initial height of the plants, the age of the plants, the species of fern, and what she planted the ferns in.
7. To determine how each fern did, Suzie could measure the height in addition to noting the appearance of all the plants. E.g. did any look paler than the others?
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The N (2.2 N) is Newton. Newton is weight.
Answer:
It is a cycle because oxaloacetic acid is the exact molecule needed to accept an acetyl-CoA molecule and start another turn of the cycle.
Answer:
4.) C
Explenation
im sure i was right i already answer this question
The statement “Feeding scrub-jays can lead to starvation of fledgling scrub-jays” is true because if humans feed the birds, they may become reliant on humans and be unable to get their own food, which can lead to starvation and malnutrition
