Answer:
The Absolute Advantage Theory assumed that only bilateral trade could take place between nations and only in two commodities that are to be exchanged.
Explanation:
In economics, the principle of absolute advantage refers to the ability of a party (an individual, a firm, or a country) to produce more of a good or service than competitors while using the same amount of resources.
Answer:
The maximum profit and loss for this position is $3 and -$7 respectively
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
For maximum profit:
= Strike price at the sale - stock price + put price - call price
= $42 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= $3
For maximum loss:
= Strike price at purchase - stock price + put price - call price
= $32 - $39 + $0.55 - $0.55
= -$7
Simply we take the difference between the strike price ,and the stock price and after that the put and call price are adjusted
Answer:
D1 = $3.50
D2 = $3.50
D3 = $3.50
Ke = 10% = 0.1
Po = <u>D1</u> + <u>D2</u> + <u>D3
</u>
(1+ke) (1+ke)2 (1+ke)3
Po = <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50
</u>
(1+0.1) (1+0.1)2 (1+0.1)3
Po = $3.18 + $2.89 + $2.63
Po = $8.70
None of the above
Explanation:
In this scenario, we need to discount the dividend in each year by the required at rate of return of 10%. The aggregate of the price obtained as a result of discounting in year 1 to year 3 gives the current market price.
Both y and x is the correct answer
Answer:
Hannah will lose her suit.
Explanation:
Niels and Hannah did not have a binding deal. They did not decide on a specific lot of land or on a price. It is never even decided how the two of them will decide on a fair method of agreeing on the price. Don't be fooled by words like binding contract. The terms are too vague and therefore Hannah will ultimately lose the case.
