1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inga [223]
3 years ago
7

Explain why officers were allowed to have small farms. (In Fort Union)

History
1 answer:
hichkok12 [17]3 years ago
4 0

The officers may have been allowed so as to make the fort a better settlement and let them live there longer.

Explanation:

Fort Union had always been fairly busy and it required a lot of food supplies due to the amount of the refugees coming in at all times.

This could help the pockets of the officers who could just now have farms there and use their own produce to turn them profits and have readily available sources of food for the migrants landing there.

This allowed them to have a rather stable stay at their post as they would in this time.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

they were captureing american sailors

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What US document did the Magna Carta influence?
grin007 [14]
It influenced the US Constitution
3 0
3 years ago
What was the original purpose of the criminal justice system in the US
alekssr [168]
The original purpose was similar to the purpose it has today. I think the words criminal justice system speaks for itself. A criminal justice system is made for criminal justice. Criminals are people who violate a systems laws and regulations. This harms not only others but a created system of regulation itself. There has to be justice for criminals- this really benefits them in the end.
7 0
3 years ago
Is no taxation without representation still relevant?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

yes it is still relevant

3 0
3 years ago
Which action is most closely associated with the Anti-Federalists' goals?
tatyana61 [14]

The correct answer is A) Oppose ratifying the Constitution.


Anti-federalists were members of a political entity that believed that a strong federal government was bad for society. These fears were based on America's experience as colonies while under the control of the British. Instead, the Anti-federalists believed that state governments should have more power. This is exactly why the Anti-federalists did not want the Constitution.


In comparison to the Articles of Confederation, the new US Constitution would give the federal government significantly more power. This worried the anti-federalists, as they did not want a repeat of what happened when America was under the control of Great Britain.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Great Britain, France, and Austria fought in the Crimean War to prevent which of the following nations from expanding into the O
    15·1 answer
  • Why are parts of the northeastern united states known as the rust belt?
    15·2 answers
  • What were some of the effects of the Industrial Revolution?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the most important factor in determining whether a primary source is credible?
    14·2 answers
  • During the Hundred Days’ Offensive, the 1st BLANK launched a series of attacks that severely weakened 2nd BLANK
    6·1 answer
  • Which of allowing enlightenment concepts was not presented by John Locke
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the Spanish viceroys created policies that removed bandits from the countryside, drained the valley, reformed the taxes
    14·1 answer
  • Why did so many Americans believe there was a crisis of power by the end of the 1950s? Had the nation, in fact, become less powe
    5·1 answer
  • Who originally founded the Safavid empire at the age of 14 year old .
    13·1 answer
  • What similarities did you find between the complaints of slaves and the complaints of factory workers?​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!