Because in order for a speech to be logical and easy to understand they relied on their conclution of speech
Answer:
she has a possitive outlook and has been given alot of advice her whole life, she is developing her personal triats throughout everyday. She strives to get better everyday.
Answer:
A. Sentance 4
Explanation:
It should be something like: If her father had come home earlier, they would've had time to go play golf.
Answer:
B After the disruption, we left
Explanation:
A dependepent clause is a clause that provides a sentence with additional info but can't stand as a sentence
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not include the name of the article, the link to it, or any further reference, doing some research we can comment on the following.
Nathan Thornburg's position on immigration is the following.
He considers that the United States federal government has to assume a definite posture on the issue of immigration that still affects the country. In his article of 2007 titled "A Case for Amnesty," Thornburg questions the way some politicians have approached the complicated issue of immigration, the consequences for the country, and the affectation of many immigrants.
He cites some examples such as the posture of the late Republican Senator John McCain.
The point of Thornburg is that the Amnesty bill could have positive political consequences for the American government, and somehow alleviate the flux of immigration to the United States.
Nathan Thornburg is a Senior Editor for "Time" magazine, and has published other important articles such as "Dropout Nation."
