"The supplement industry is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration much like medications, therefore it is safe for a student-athlete to take supplements to help gain muscle mass or to aid in weight loss" is FALSE.
<u>Answer:</u> Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
FDA regulates the supplement industry under the power of "Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA)". These supplements have short-term benefits on human body which is covered under one of the disadvantages supplements have. Doping is totally unacceptable by any Sports Association of World, but again prescription drugs are regulated by FDA.
These have benefits, but it is mandatory for such products to have guidelines or warnings as required according to FDA norms as they have demerits too. Therefore it is not safe for students and athletes to consume weight reduction or muscle gain medications.
It should be noted that the main goal when normalizing is to decompose relations, therefore, the statement given is true.
It should be noted that the main goal during normalization include the minimization of data redundancy and simplifying the enforcement of referential integrity.
Also, normalization makes it easier to maintain data and decompose relations with anomalies to produce smaller, well-structured relations.
Learn more on:
brainly.com/question/25767935
Answer:
c. get the respondent to answer a question more fully.
Explanation:
A probe is applied to promote conversation without affecting the answer. It is especially appropriate for open-ended questions. Probes are utilized more commonly in open-ended questions than in closed-ended ones. The basic function of a probe is to provide the respondent to answer the questions completely.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.