Answer:the governor is MOST responsible for enforcing the laws of the state
Explanation:
Answer:
A demurrer.
Explanation:
Judicial power can be defined as the power given to the courts to act and pronounce judgment on a case after making a decision with respect to the parties that brought the case for litigation. Therefore, when a judge presiding over a court of competent jurisdiction gives a verdict or judgment on a case, his or her decision is final and can only be upturned by a higher court such as a court of appeal (appellate court) and supreme court.
A pleading filed by one party to dismiss the other party's pleading for failing to state a cause of action is known as a demurrer.
This ultimately implies that, a demurrer is a pleading written by the defendant as a response to a court proceeding in which he or she acknowledges that the allegations in a complaint might be true and factual but it is insufficient to justify or establish a valid legal action.
For example, a party might file for a demurrer if a complaint infringes his or her right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined in the Constitution.
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1
Declaration, the United Nations Charter, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights play in establishing international human rights law. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was published in 1948, and it was this document that outlined the concepts that eventually made human rights a part of international law.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What
are Human Rights?</h3>
Generally, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, established the principles by which human rights have been codified into international law in the years thereafter.
In conclusion, A person's human rights are inherent in his or her humanity; no state grants them. No matter where we come from, what we look like, what religion we practice, what language we speak, or any other distinction we could have, we all have the same inalienable rights.
Read more about Human Rights
brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ1
