1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yaroslaw [1]
3 years ago
8

How did Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points differ from the Paris Peace Conference agreements?

History
1 answer:
RUDIKE [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The biggest difference between Wilson's Fourteen points and the Paris Peace Conference agreement was on how to deal with the war losses and the socio-economic future of Europe.

Explanation:

Woodrow Wilson did not talk about war repatriation or any 'revenge' upon an enemy nation. Instead he spoke about the rights of people, discussed free trade and an end to hostilities and also discussed the formation of a few borders, especially an Independent Polish State and the future of the Ottoman Empire.

This however, did not go down well with the European powers, who had bared the real cost of the war. The French industry had collapsed under German pressure and the country was looking for millions in repatriation costs.

The Russians were not happy with an Independent 'Polish' State and had their own claim to the region.

Eventually, the 14 points were rejected, which many claim, eventually led to the second world war.

You might be interested in
What is happiness?????​
almond37 [142]

Answer:

Happiness is the state of being happy

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What events led to the South's defeat of the Civil War
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The most convincing 'internal' factor behind southern defeat was the very institution that prompted secession: slavery. Enslaved people fled to join the Union army, depriving the South of labor and strengthening the North by more than 100,000 soldiers. Even so, slavery was not in itself the cause of defeat.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What demographic change has consequences for both natural resources and the ability of countries to provide for their people?
Rudiy27

The correct answer is a rapid increase in population

Rapid population increases like those experienced in third world countries exert a huge pressure on limited natural resources and also put pressure on governments. This is especially complicated by the lack of education which leads to high poverty levels

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10-(-12)÷4 ×3<br>help me i dont know
mars1129 [50]
The answer to 10-(-12)/4 x 3 = 19
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Most of the Indian subcontinent is in the shape of a ______ . ?
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

Diamond?

Explanation:

I think that's the shape India resembles the most.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How was Judaism different than previous polytheistic belief
    13·1 answer
  • After the end of the US occupation, what happened to the Japanese economy?
    12·2 answers
  • What might the navy have done differently to minimize damage from the attack on pearl harbor?
    11·1 answer
  • The explosive growth of jobs in what industries drew americans to the sunbelt?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Alexander HamiltonAnd Thomas Jefferson views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ
    13·1 answer
  • Which river system ran parallel to royal road
    5·1 answer
  • Which headings best complete the chart? X: Competition Y: Parasitism X: Competition Y: Commensalism X:Commensalism Y: Mutualism
    14·2 answers
  • The first wave of immigrants to the United States was largely from northern and central Europe.
    6·1 answer
  • “What is written in the Law?” [Jesus] replied. . . .
    6·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest! Match the words circled :)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!