Revolution in my words means:
- When the people of a country/nation revolt against the government because they think something is wrong
Here is an example of a revolution:
They began a revolution after the neighboring country attacked the other country, and they thought the nation was not doing enough.
<span>mobilization of the country's entire population and economy to produce the soldiers, food supplies, ammunitions and money necessary to win the war. </span>
<span>Mexica people unite their empire to make a powerful force in Meso America. They became powerful in the 15th century by conquering their immediate neighbors and demanded tribute. They treat their people depending on the tribute system. When there is a tribute given, then they will not hurt them; but if there will be no tribute given, then those people will be killed or even sold to slavery or sacrifice to gods.
</span>
<em>The rule of the British in India is possibly the most controversial and the most hotly debated aspect of the history of the British empire. Admirers of British rule point to the economic developments, the legal and administrative system, the fact that India became the centre of world politics. Critics of British rule generally point out that all of these benefits went to a tiny British ruling class and the majority of Indians gained little. Admirers of British rule counter this by saying that most Indians were poor and oppressed by their own leaders before the British arrived, and that British rule was less harsh on ordinary Indians than rule by Indian princes.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Perhaps the main reason why the arguments are so heated and so complex is that India was very different from the other territories that made up the empire. North America and Australia, for example, were sparsely populated and their populations were less economically developed than Britain. India, however, had a huge population and was just as developed as Britain in the 1700s when the British arrived.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. The British were very effective at infiltrating these states and gradually taking control. They often left the local princes in charge of the various parts of India. These local princes were effective at maintaining British rule and gained much from being loyal to the British.</em>
