Answer:
The American Federation of Labour (AFL) sought to increase wages, reduce working hours, and greatly improve upon the working conditions of workers throughout America.
Explanation:
The envisioned to do this by mobilising skilled workers for forming unions with workers in the same trade across the country. they chose to focus their efforts in negotiating with employers for the above mentioned goals rather than industry owners.
For the answer to the question above asking at $5 a bushel, there is an excess supply of wheat. is this price above or below the equilibrium price?
I think it is a price floor above the equilibrium price.The price is too high so that the suppliers will produce more than the consumption.
Because no time period is specified, I am going to go with carefully.
Answer:
1. For the knowledge
2. If you need it in the future (what if u do???)
3. exams?
4. If u wanna become a teacher, You would need to know it to teach it.
Explanation:
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
