Answer:
Juliet is not allowed to associate with Romeo because he is a Montague. If he had any other name it would be fine. She’s complaining that his name is meaningless. If the rose had any other name it would still be the same. So with Romeo; he would still be the same beautiful young man even if he had a different name. “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” Juliet knows that the blood feud prevents her from loving a Montague. She ponders it. It’s only your name that’s the enemy. You are what you are, even though you may be a Montague. What’s ‘Montague’? It isn’t hand or foot or arm or face or any other part belonging to a man. Oh I wish you had a different name. What is so special about a name? A rose, even if it were called something else, would smell just as sweet. So Romeo would still have all the perfection that he has, even if he were not called Romeo. Romeo, take off your name and in exchange for that whole name, which is not really a part of what you are, you can have all of me.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hindsight bias or <u>knew-it-all phenomenon</u> refers to a tendency for people to think about events. <u>When an event happens, people believe that they would have predicted or have known the outcome of the event</u>. It is a result of overconfidence about our prediction ability.
Here, although Niaz has had no hint to know what may happen, he believes that it was predictable.
<span>The sentence is built around the simple subject “dad” and simple predicate “gave.” It also contains both a direct object “lunches” and indirect object “us.”
</span><span>Unfazed by the morning frenzy before school is a prepositional phrase modifying gave. or dad. or something. but you don't need to know that and i'm stupid so let's move on.
Before we left is also a prepositional phrase. I'm still stupid so let's move on.
The subject is dad, verb is gave, and the direct object is lunches because it's what dad gave, it's the receiver of the action.
The indirect object is us because it's whom received th</span>e verb. Or something. I'm still stupid.
The correct answer is PARALLELISM
Parallelism refers to a rhetorical device that is used to coordinate ideas, arrange it in sentences, and point out relations. Sometimes, there are similar wordings used to highlight comparisons. In this case, "conscientious" and "conscience" are being paralleled.
