hey bae wyd you single because i want go out
Answer:
The answer is that it upheld Jim Crow laws and segregation in the South.
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.
the continuum of events leading from past to present
The disguise was mostly symbolic in nature; they knew they would be recognized as non-Indians. The act of wearing “Indian dress” was to express to the world that the American colonists identified themselves as “Americans” and no longer considered themselves British subjects.
Answer:
Las invasiones británicas del Río de la Plata fueron una serie de intentos británicos infructuosos de tomar el control de áreas en el Virreinato colonial español del Río de la Plata que estaban ubicadas alrededor del Río de la Plata en América del Sur, en los actuales Argentina y Uruguay. Las invasiones tuvieron lugar entre 1806 y 1807, como parte de las Guerras Napoleónicas, cuando España era un aliado
