What is the thesis statement in chapter 1 of David Nirenberg's Communities of Violence?

History

1 answer:

GalinKa [24]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question has no options, we can say the following.

The thesis statement in chapter 1 of David Nirenberg's "Communities of Violence" is that aggressions and attacks over social classes, ethnicity, or race can be identified since the 14th century in the European Middle Ages. The author states that these forms of aggression can be found in the French and Spanish Royal courts. The aggressions were constant and violent against Jewish people, prostitutes, sick people, Muslims, and other minorities. He says that there were groups of people in power who directed these aggressions to maintain control over the people.

You might be interested in

La primera cosa que los estados (antiguas colonias) lo hizo después de la Declaración de la Independencia fue el siguiente:

Leokris [45]

<span>The first thing that the states (former colonies) did after the Declaration of Independence was the following: </span>

4 0

3 years ago

Why did frederick douglass value history so highly

Lena [83]

Douglass and the abolitionists argued that because the aim of the Civil War was to end slavery, African Americans should be allowed to engage in the fight for their freedom. Douglass publicized this view in his newspapers and several speeches.

5 0

3 years ago

Who was president during the Iran-Contra scandal?

Katena32 [7]

Answer:

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

6 0

2 years ago

The lapita has a very distinctive type of?

NARA [144]

Ceramics

Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the democratic party and how does it relate to andrew jackson?

zepelin [54]

Answer:

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, and is the party of unequal treatment based on race, rather than equal opportunity based on merit.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson was related to the Democratic Party, as it was widely known with it's history of impeding on people's rights based on skin-color or national origin. He also was the embodiment of many of the beliefs of the Democratic Party. Firstly, he embraced the usage of slavery, and was a ardent holder of slaves. The Democratic Party had always worked for keeping the institution of slavery as a means of not only workforce and profit, but also as a way to degrade "non-whites" into being second-class humans, (also commonly known as sub-humans). Piggy-backing off of the issue of slavery, Jackson also campaigned against many of the Native American tribes that were located to the west of the then-US, starting wars and taking lands from the defeated Native American tribes. Again, the Native American tribes were classified as sub-humans, and did not receive any benefits that would generally be implied to a white-US citizen.

This led to the unpopularity of Jackson within the Whig-Republican circles, and he was succeeded by Martin van Buren.

4 0

2 years ago