1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa05 [86]
3 years ago
8

Which statement about the size of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent is true? A. It included Western Europe, the Balkans, N

orth Africa, and parts of the Middle East. B. It stretched from the northern tip of Scandinavia to the Indian Ocean. C. It encompassed the territory of modern-day Germany, Denmark, and Poland. D. It covered most of the African continent and all of what is now
History
2 answers:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is A: It included Western Europe, the Balkans, North Africa, and parts of the Middle East.
tester [92]3 years ago
3 0

The answer is "A" :)

You might be interested in
How might a Northerner react to the actions of John Wilkes Booth? *
likoan [24]
A because he was hated by northerners, did not lead the Confederate army, and did not carry out the March to the Sea.
6 0
4 years ago
Pleaseeee help it’s important
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:

ending violence against america indians in the great plains

4 0
3 years ago
Absolutist monarchs in Europe sought to do which of these?
Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

Absolute monarch in Europe sought to centralized political power within their countries.

Explanation:

Absolute monarch in Europe sought to centralized political power within their countries.

Absolute monarch believed that God has created monarchy.

They increased the strength of army to fight for the king. As to feed all troop, king always required of money and whenever parliament sanctioned order to refuse the requirement, King itself dissolved the parliament

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Stamp Act?
leonid [27]
I would have to say that the best answer is probably C:
5 0
3 years ago
Why was the Battle of New Orleans in the War of 1812 sometimes thought of as a "meaningless" American victory?lol nvm
MrRissso [65]

A couple of weeks before the Battle of New Orleans, the U.S. and British governments had negotiated and signed a peace treaty that put an effective end to the war between the two countries. Given that news from Europe took about a month to reach the U.S., both the U.S. soldiers led by General Andrew Jackson and the Red Coats led by General Sir Edward Pakenham was a pointless confrontation. A few weeks after the resounding U.S. victory (only 13 men were killed on the U.S. side and 285 on the British side), Jackson and his men got news of the peace treaty signed before their feat of arms.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • NEED HELP NOW! NO TROLL ANSWERS!
    6·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the u.s. government selling war bonds during world war 1
    14·1 answer
  • I'm only a child and I don't have all the solutions, but I want you to realise, neither do you!
    14·1 answer
  • The main economic activity that occurs in the US regions circled on the map above is __________. A. farming B. fishing C. manufa
    9·1 answer
  • What European settlers had the biggest negative effect on the Native American Indians
    5·1 answer
  • PLZ ANSWET NOW I NEED HELP BAD
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the three causes of the american revolution
    12·1 answer
  • When did the grand canyon became a national park?
    9·2 answers
  • everybody follow me on ro blox if u play it my username is wwekane9365 cause i wanna get 1,000 follows
    7·1 answer
  • Key Concept 9.2: The end of the Cold War and new challenges to US leadership in the world forced the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!