The settlement had negative results for Native Americans. Despite the fact that Native American tribes did every so often shape positive associations with European pilgrims, changeless European settlement in America, in the end, prompted sickness and removal. Local Americans had no insusceptibility to European ailments and their populace was crushed by the presentation of sicknesses like smallpox. After some time, most surviving tribes were persuasively migrated from their conventional grounds to clear a path for extending European settlements.
Black codes were restrictive laws designed to limit the freedom of African Americans and ensure their availability as a cheap labor force after slavery was abolished during the Civil War. Under black codes, many states required Black people to sign yearly labor contracts; if they refused, they risked being arrested, fined and forced into unpaid labor.
Even as former enslaved people fought to assert their independence and gain economic autonomy during the earliest years of Reconstruction. While the codes granted certain freedoms to African Americans—including the right to buy and own property, marry, make contracts and testify in court (only in cases involving people of their own race)—their primary purpose was to restrict Black peoples’ labor and activity. Black people who broke labor contracts were subject to arrest, beating and forced labor, and apprenticeship laws forced many minors into unpaid labor for white planters.
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with "revising the will of the past," since activist justices take a stronger role in upending previous decisions. </span>
May 28, 2016
May 28, 2016
May 28, 2016
