1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sauron [17]
3 years ago
14

How does Monroe's speech communicate a strategy for both peacetime and military action, if provoked?

History
1 answer:
gregori [183]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Monroe's speech communicate a strategy for both peacetime and military action, if provoked by:

Identifying the problem the customer is having in case no one can explain it. To provide attention, to understand the need and make it clear, to come out with the solution that would provide the best level of satisfaction, by presenting the solution after understanding it, and finally solve it.

Explanation:

Monroe's speech is a strategy to communicate in peacetime and military action if provoked. But it was born in a very business-oriented perspective. Because it refers to the group affected is a "costumer" also that one perspective has to convince the other of the problem, the plan, and the need to take action. Because it considers that the "customer" or the affected party can't figure out by insight the need to react.

You might be interested in
Why do you think there is less variation in languages spoken in the United States
7nadin3 [17]
I think its because the first people who came here were originally close in distance (ie. most people came from England and places near England.) When we brought slaves over, the African people along with the native people to the Americas (the native Americans) had to learn to understand us to make peace, trade, and other stuff.
4 0
3 years ago
Help! please marking brainliest
ozzi

Answer:

B

Explanation:

i believe that this is the right answer and very sorry if it is wrong  

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone plz help me? :(
koban [17]

Answer:

A 100%

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer these questions correctly.
denis-greek [22]

13. Korea I think. 14. Central Intelligence Agency 23. They didnt engage directly in military conflict. and 24. Joesph McCarthy

8 0
4 years ago
in the second paragraph, what did churchill claim could have prevented germany from taking the sudentenland? Did he offer any ev
olchik [2.2K]

Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:

  • They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.

<h3>What is a claim?</h3>

A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.

In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.

Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:

brainly.com/question/24909197

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What nations dominated the atlantic slave trade?
    15·1 answer
  • How did a cooler, drier climate affect agriculture in the Indus River Valley? Choose four that apply. It reduced the amount of f
    14·3 answers
  • Why were farmers who moved to the city trapped there? They owed their landlords too much money to leave. They were promised more
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help :(
    7·2 answers
  • Does the media act with or against the government mrmills
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement about Shi'ite Muslims is true?
    13·2 answers
  • Which American Indian group appeared to win a legal victory against removal in Worcester V. Georgia?
    11·1 answer
  • What effect did the Black Death have on the feudal system?​
    6·2 answers
  • Which event reversed many of the gains African Americans made in the 1870s??
    7·1 answer
  • What are the two main land forms of Southeast Asia
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!