Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer: (A) Loyalty
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, Henry hutchins is dissatisfied with his job but he believes to the supervisor of the company that he helps in reducing the stress and disappointment from the job.
The Henry repose to the given problem is refers as the loyalty as he shows faith to his supervisor and also shows the loyalty that he helps in improve the conditions of his job.
The loyalty is the term that shows the positive, reliable and the trust quality of the person that the one person devoted to other.
Therefore, Option (A) is correct answer.
Answer:
The budgeted sales revenue is : $168,000
Explanation:
In 2019, as Mary's Basket Company has the opening Inventory balance of 2,000 baskets; projects to manufactures 24,000 baskets, plans to maintain ending inventory at $2,000 baskets without any work-in-process inventory; We have the baskets available for sales in the year of 2019 is:
Actual Ending Balance of 2018 + Projected manufactured baskets during the year 2019 - Planned ending Balance of the year 2019 = 2,000 + 24,000 - 2,000 = 24,000
The unit price is projected at $7.
Thus, we have the projected sales revenue is:
Projected Unit price x Projected baskets available for sales = 7 x 24,000 = $168,000
Answer: B.
Explanation: Contributions to individuals, foreign governments, foreign charities, and certain private foundations similarly are not deductible.
Answer:
$202,701,713.58
Explanation:
Present value of this liability = Value of liability / ((1+r)^t)
Present value of this liability = $750 million / ((1+0.08)^17)
Present value of this liability = $750 million / (1.08)^17
Present value of this liability = $750 million / 3.7000180548
Present value of this liability = $202,701,713.5840815
Present value of this liability = $202,701,713.58
