Answer:
d. by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end
Explanation:
According to the given draft paragraph from an argumentative essay, the narrator talks about the effect of the World War and tries to justify the use of the hydrogen bomb on Japan which led to their unconditional surrender by saying that it helped end the war quickly and save more lives.
However, at the end, he just says that the effects of the radiation were still there, without any preamble or prior claim
The author should revise the paragraph by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end. This is because, they are not a suitable conclusion to the draft paragraph.
Answer:
They were afraid of what she represented.
Explanation:
Malala You sa f z ai is a young girl from the Sw a t valley in Pakistan who was shot on the head by the Taliban for opposing their di k tat of no education for girls. And in that act of shooting her, the teenage girl grew to become one of the leading voices for the importance of education for girls and would become a worldwide activist for the same.
In her speech at the United Nations, Malala emphasized her purpose;
<em>"I speak – not for myself, but all girls and boys.
</em>
<em>I raise my voice – not so that I can shout, but so that those without a voice can be heard.
</em>
<em>Those who have fought for their rights:
</em>
<em>Their right to live in peace. Their right to be treated with dignity. Their right to equality of opportunity.
</em>
<em>Their right to be educated."</em>
And talking about the Taliban and their failed attempt at trying to silence her from advocating for the rights of girls to get an education, she only turned out stronger. She declares <em>"They thought that the bullets would silence us. But they failed. And then, out of that silence came, thousands of voices."</em>
This shows that the Taliban shot her out of fear for what she represents.
In this story, "My sister's keeper", the main character Anna, is the keeper because she must donate organs and blood to her sister to keep her alive.
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. Chaucer uses irony to describe the faults and shortcomings of <span>all the pilgrims from the clerical estate. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
The correct answer is A, 'analyze'. When you analyze a character's actions, you are examining them and attempting to understand them. Answer choice B is incorrect, because gathering details about a character's actions does not necessarily mean that you understand them. Answer choices C and D are incorrect because they are part of the writing process, and when you examine a character's actions, you are typically reading.
Hope this helps!
