The correct answer should be <span>B. Is there a chance this job might not work out?
This is a risk related question because it is a part of risk assessment. When asking such questions, you usually analyze the possible situation and the outcome in order to prevent bad things from happening. People ask this question when they decide on whether the business endeavor is a risk that they're willing to take or not. The other questions are important as well but are not as much related to risk assessment.</span>
The best place with the right church for you.
Answer:
Explanation:On June 25, 2013, the Court ruled by a 5 to 4 vote that Section 4(b) was unconstitutional because the coverage formula was based on data over 40 years old, making it no longer responsive to current needs and therefore an impermissible burden on the constitutional principles of federalism and equal sovereignty of the states.[
The main law regulating child labor in the United States is the Fair Labor Standards Act. For non-agricultural jobs, children under 14 may not be employed, children between 14 and 16 may be employed in allowed occupations during limited hours, and children between 16 and 18 may be employed for unlimited hours in non-hazardous occupations.[1] A number of exceptions to these rules exist, such as for employment by parents, newspaper delivery, and child actors.[1] The regulations for agricultural employment are generally less strict.
The economics of child work involves supply and demand relationships on at least three levels: the supply and demand of labor on the national (and international) level; the supply and demand of labor at the level of the firm or enterprise; the supply and demand for labor (and other functions) in the family. But a complete picture of the economics of child labor cannot be limited to simply determining supply and demand functions, because the political economy of child labor varies significantly from what a simple formal model might predict. Suppose a country could effectively outlaw child labor. Three consequences would follow: (1) the families (and the economy) would lose the income generated by their children; (2) the supply of labor would fall, driving up wages for adult workers; and (3) the opportunity cost of a child’s working time would shrink, making staying in school (assuming schools were available) much more attractive. In principle, a virtuous circle would follow: with more schooling, the children would get more skills and become more productive adults, raising wages and family welfare.20 To the extent that the demand for labor is elastic, however, the increase in wages implies that the total number of jobs would fall.
The labor supply effects are the basic outline of the logic that underlies almost all nations’ laws against child labor, as well as the international minimum age standard set in ILO Convention 138 and much of the anti-child labor statements during the recent protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Monetary Fund. This model does describe in very simplified form the long-term history of child work in the economic development of developed economies. But in the short-term, the virtuous circle seldom occurs in real life as quickly as the simple, static model suggests. The reason for the model’s short-term failure is that child work results from a complex interweaving of need, tradition, culture, family dynamics and the availability of alternative activities for children.
History suggests that children tend to work less, and go to school more, as a result of several related economic and social trends. the political economy of a place plays at least as big a part as per capita income in determining the level of child labor there.
With the help of this quote(Without feelings of respect, what is there to distinguish men from beasts) Confucius has given a message to show basic human respect for other people.
Explanation:
The quote, 'Without feelings of respect, what is there to distinguish men from beasts' holds a much deeper meaning. This quote was quoted by the renowned Chinese philosopher Confucius.
Here, Confucius is trying to state that we as a human being should respect another being. Humanity is the pillar of every social relationships.
Confucius then distinguishes between humans and beasts. He says if we don't show kindness and respect for other people then what is the difference between them and us? We are no less than animals if we lack empathy.
And almost everyone agrees with what Confucius has to say, because humanity and love for another being are the only things which matters in a long run.
