1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
2 years ago
12

Use multiplication to write 2 + 2 + 2 + 2+2.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Katena32 [7]2 years ago
8 0
2 x 5
2+2+2+2+2= 10
2 x 5= 10
Elina [12.6K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

5 × 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiplication is a simpler way of writing 'adding the same number multiple times'

Here you have added 5 2s together

So the answer is 5 times 2

You might be interested in
5.2.14. For the negative binomial pdf p (k; p, r) = k+r−1 (1 − p)kpr, find the maximum likelihood k estimator for p if r is know
Volgvan

Answer:

\hat p = \frac{r}{\bar x +r}

Step-by-step explanation:

A negative binomial random variable "is the number X of repeated trials to produce r successes in a negative binomial experiment. The probability distribution of a negative binomial random variable is called a negative binomial distribution, this distribution is known as the Pascal distribution".

And the probability mass function is given by:

P(X=x) = (x+r-1 C k)p^r (1-p)^{x}

Where r represent the number successes after the k failures and p is the probability of a success on any given trial.

Solution to the problem

For this case the likehoof function is given by:

L(\theta , x_i) = \prod_{i=1}^n f(\theta ,x_i)

If we replace the mass function we got:

L(p, x_i) = \prod_{i=1}^n (x_i +r-1 C k) p^r (1-p)^{x_i}

When we take the derivate of the likehood function we got:

l(p,x_i) = \sum_{i=1}^n [log (x_i +r-1 C k) + r log(p) + x_i log(1-p)]

And in order to estimate the likehood estimator for p we need to take the derivate from the last expression and we got:

\frac{dl(p,x_i)}{dp} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{r}{p} -\frac{x_i}{1-p}

And we can separete the sum and we got:

\frac{dl(p,x_i)}{dp} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{r}{p} -\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x_i}{1-p}

Now we need to find the critical point setting equal to zero this derivate and we got:

\frac{dl(p,x_i)}{dp} = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{r}{p} -\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x_i}{1-p}=0

\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{r}{p} =\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x_i}{1-p}

For the left and right part of the expression we just have this using the properties for a sum and taking in count that p is a fixed value:

\frac{nr}{p}= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{1-p}

Now we need to solve the value of \hat p from the last equation like this:

nr(1-p) = p \sum_{i=1}^n x_i

nr -nrp =p \sum_{i=1}^n x_i

p \sum_{i=1}^n x_i +nrp = nr

p[\sum_{i=1}^n x_i +nr]= nr

And if we solve for \hat p we got:

\hat p = \frac{nr}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i +nr}

And if we divide numerator and denominator by n we got:

\hat p = \frac{r}{\bar x +r}

Since \bar x = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}

4 0
3 years ago
A rectangular jewelry box costs $125 to gold plate. Calculate the cost of gold plating a box which is similar in shape and that
Alja [10]
To determine the amount of gold plating necessary for the similar box, you will use the fact that it is 8 times larger in volume to determine how many times larger the area is.  This would be what you will multiply $125 by.

Volume is a three dimensional measurement, so the fact that it is 8 times larger tells us each dimension was 2 times larger (2 x 2 x 2=8).  

Area is a two dimensional measurement, so the area would have been 2 x 2 or 4 times larger.  This means the price would be 4 times as much.
$125 x 4 = $500.

It will cost $500 to gold plate the similar jewelry box.
7 0
3 years ago
If f(x)=3x^2-2 and g(x)=4x+2 what is the value of f+g 2
Papessa [141]

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)

f(x) + g(x) = 3x² - 2 + 4x + 2 = 3x² + 4x

Substitute x = 2 into f(x) + g(x)

(f + g)(2) = 3(2)² + 4(2) = (3 × 4) + 8 = 12 + 8 = 20

5 0
2 years ago
Which rational number is one tick mark to the left of -3/4
Zolol [24]

I'm assuming each tickmark is 1/4 = 0.25

If that assumption is correct, then going one tickmark to the left of -3/4 lands you on -4/4 which simplifies to -1.

So -1 is one tickmark to the left of -3/4

Again, this all hinges on the assumption that each tickmark is 1/4 a unit away from its neighbor.

5 0
3 years ago
What is equivalent to y=(x+3)2+53
viva [34]
The answer is y=2x+59
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Use the arc length formula and the given information to find θ. s = 4 m, r = 13 m; θ = ?
    9·2 answers
  • How to convert the equation<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%20%5Cfrac%7Bq%7D%7B5%20%7B%7D%5E%7Bx%7D%20%7D%20" id
    8·1 answer
  • What is 1.5 divided by 1/6?
    10·1 answer
  • If the polynomial x4+2x3 + 8x2+12x+18 is divided by another polynomial x2+5, the remainder comes out to be px+q. Find the value
    5·1 answer
  • Nick says 2 1/4 equals 4 ÷ 9. Is he correct? Explain.
    5·1 answer
  • Dan has x dollars. Frank has 7 times as much as Dan. Luke has 2 dollars fewer than Frank. How much do they have in all?
    15·2 answers
  • GUYS HELP ME.. plEASEEEEE
    11·1 answer
  • Which measures are equivalent to 10 meters​
    12·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!!!! I REALLY NEED HELP
    7·1 answer
  • Bryson is picking green beans. He has already picked 1 and one-fourth bushels and picks at a rate of StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndF
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!