Lenin believed in "pure communism" a lot like Karl Marx -the founder of communism- while Stalin was not. Stalin basically wanted to take over Russia -he was thought to be worse than Czar Nicolas- Stalin is believed to have murdered the Czar and also was bit of a '"rule-breaker" considering pure communism had no religion because it was false hope but Stalin allowed it to control the people. Stalin would murder people aginst communism and used the KGB to control people. Now back to Lenin, Lenin was aginst the war (the whole communism thing took off after WW1) and Lenin saw that after the war was a great time to carry on Marx's work (Marx passed away shortly after the war) Lenin was a great speaker and really knew how to "get the crowd going" .
Answer:
Massive destruction of environment.
Explanation:
One Ballistic missile is capable to destroy around 4,800 to 11,500 km of its surrounding environment.
But this is only the beginning.
Countries today has included nuclear component into the missiles. So not only the missile created massive damages, it also make that area becomes radioactive for a couple of decades. Making it impossible for any type of organisms to live in that area.
The answer is human resources
Answer:
1 In the late 1800s, people in many parts of the world decided to leave their homes and immigrate to the United States. Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity.
2 Nativism is the political policy of promoting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants, including by supporting immigration-restriction measures. ... Those who hold this political view, however, do not typically accept the label.
3 sorry i dont know
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
When the Louisiana voters in 1930 elected Huey Long to the United States Senate, the thirty-seven-year-old dynamo already exercised a tight grip over state politics, built up during his years as governor. Unwilling to relinquish the reins of state power to an unfriendly lieutenant governor, Long delayed claiming his Senate seat until January 1932. The next summer, he employed his charismatic eloquence on behalf of both presidential candidate Franklin D. Roosevelt and his personal choice for the second Louisiana Senate seat, U. S. Representative John H. Overton. Long's strength in Louisiana had no equal, and in the September 13, 1932, primary, John Overton easily defeated incumbent Senator Edwin Broussard for the Democratic nomination, a prelude to an unopposed victory in the general election.
