Tweaser is used to pick up objects
Correct answer: the hypothetico-deductive method.
Explanation: This model or method is a propose description of the scientific method. A researcher propose an hypothesis in a form that can be falsifiable. Then he/she must come up with tests for the observable data that he/she has. With this test the hypothesis can be proven true or false.
In summary, this method (The H-D method) is the procedure to build scientific theories. The results obtained come from direct observation or experimentation and will help to predict future effects that can be verified or proven by empirical evidence.
Answer:
- Sampling bias.
Explanation:
Sampling bias is demonstrated as the partiality or bias displayed while selecting the samples(selection of non-random sample with lower sampling probability) for a particular survey or research which eventually affects the conclusion of the .
As per the question, the most significant problem with the given inference would be 'sampling bias' as the samples are not selected on random basis(interviewed people support arts on money basis) which is reflected through the observation that 'a large majority of Americans are willing to support the arts by giving money to local theater groups.' This bias in sampling may affect the validity of the results and lead to a faulty conclusion.
Explanation:
1)was initially isolationist but opened trade with America. China, however, resisted Western influence, especially during the Boxer rebellion. Because of Japan's response, Japan increased in strength during its Meiji Period , even winning a war against Russia
2)These include economic, exploratory, ethnocentric, political, and religious motives.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
