Answer: B increasing government spending
Explanation:
Answer:
Right choice:
They fought on both sides of the conflict, but most allied with the British.
Explanation:
The Native American tribes sided with both sides, mainly for benefits in trade and other advantages, though they did not share the imperial goals and feelings of their allies. In Canada, the Iroquois supported the British side, while the Huron Confederacy sided with the French, with whom they had had a good trade exchange since the 17th century. Another factors was the deep rivalry with the Iroquois.
In the American territory, most tribes chose the British side. It was because of the regular trade benefits. Native tribes had assimilated many European manufactured goods in their lifestyle, and some items had even a symbolic importance for chiefs and their policies of alliances. The British supply of such goods was more reliable than the French line of supply.
It provided unlimited drawn-out emergency actions of
prolonged detention, arrest with no trial or review from the judiciary during
World War II. This was due to activities
from nationalist rebels who might engage in alleged conspiracies while the war
was being waged.
Many Indians saw it as an abuse of power because they can
arrested without a warrant.
Harthal refers to strikes in workplaces where the workplace
is closed by striking employees. Satyagraha is non-violent protest which what
Gandhi used. I means insistence of the truth.
Although Nehru and Gandhi were always together there were
times when they were at odds with each other.
The Salt March was one example because Nehru had doubts but when he saw
the potential of it, he changed his mind.
Another was when he demanded a complete separation from the British and
this was rejected by Gandhi.
<span> </span>
The main themes of the play are: fate and free will with the
inevitability of oracular predictions is a theme that often occurs in
Greek tragedies the conflict between the individual and the state
similar to that in Sophocles’ “Antigone” and people’s willingness to ignore painful truths both Oedipus and Jocasta clutch
at unlikely details in order to avoiding facing up to the inceasingly
apparent truth and sight and blindness the irony that the blind seer Tiresius can actually “see” more clearly than the supposedly clear-eyed Oedipus<span>, who is in reality blind to the truth about his origins and his inadvertent crimes.
</span>
<span>Hope my answer would be a great help for you.
</span>
<span>
</span>
<span />
