What's the best flashcard app? - Anki or Quizlet? Or maybe even Tinycards?

Advanced Placement (AP)

2 answers:

Masja [62]4 years ago

6 0

I would recommend Tinycards. I've been using them forever and it's just the best. Here is why:

The app enables you to 'favorite' good decks, to keep them visible while you try hard to excise rubbish ones from your memory. Of course, you can also make your own. The interface for doing so is straightforward, with you loading images from your device, and tapping in answers.

WINSTONCH [101]4 years ago

4 0

Well I would recommend quizlet because of many reasons. Here are why:

Modern interface.

Apps for iOS and Android that can be used offline. There’s even an app for Windows 10 Mobile, but I have not tried it.

Allows you to add images to words, and helps you find the images in the first place.

Has optional test modes: multiple choice, or type the answers.

Can read the words out loud to you in a pleasing voice with good pronunciation and accent.

You can even type in Pinyin, and it will read the Mandarin words out loud perfectly!

You can “star” words that are most difficult to you, and review only those.

Has flashcard decks that other people have created, that you can practice.

Allows you to import and export data.

Resumes where you left off in flashcard sets when you go back to review them.

Here is why I would recommend Anki:

Has an app for iOS, Android, and Windows 10 (including Windows 10 Mobile), and a desktop application for any version of Windows. These can be used offline. There’s also a web app that can be used for practice on any platform with a web browser.

After each flashcard, you can file it into one of three review decks: Soon (<1 minute), Good (<10 minutes), or Easy (4 days). These decks allow you to practice the hardest words (Soon) most frequently.

Allows you to add images to words.

Allows you to add voice recording of words.

Has flashcard decks that other people have created, that you can practice.

Allows you to import and export data.

You might be interested in

briefly describe the composition and formation of an accretionary wedge, and explain how it can form a mountain range

Tema [17]

The accretionary wedge is like the accretionary prism and the definition of that is : *a mass of sedimentary material scraped off a region of oceanic crust during subduction and piled up at the edge of the overriding plate (source : dictionary)* and the formation is when two plates crash and one slides under the other one I believe and sand ad sediment go into the little open space between them that give you a wedge. Hope I helped.

5 0

3 years ago

An exercise in which you act out an interview before the actual interview is known as a

gogolik [260]

An exercise in which you act out an interview before the actual interview is known as a

Mock interview
<span />

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find a real-life mention of a derivative.

Alinara [238K]

Answer:

This page in a nutshell: Summarize in your own words instead of closely paraphrasing. Closely paraphrased material that infringes on the copyright of its source material should be rewritten or deleted to avoid infringement, and to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policy. Public domain sources and CC-BY-SA-compatible sources may be closely paraphrased, and limited close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources may also be permitted as fair use. Attribution is always required.

For information on copy and pasting text, see Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources.

Close paraphrasing is the superficial modification of material from another source. Editors should generally summarize source material in their own words, adding inline citations as required by the sourcing policy.

Limited close paraphrasing is appropriate within reason, as is quoting, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text – for example, by adding "John Smith wrote ...", together with a footnote containing the citation at the end of the clause, sentence or paragraph. Limited close paraphrasing is also appropriate if there are only a limited number of ways to say the same thing.

Close paraphrasing without in-text attribution may constitute plagiarism, and when extensive (with or without in-text attribution) may also violate Wikipedia's copyright policy, which forbids Wikipedia contributors from copying an excessive amount of material directly from other sources. Public domain material must likewise be attributed to avoid plagiarism. If the source material bears a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses, copying or closely paraphrasing it is not a copyright violation so long as the source is attributed somewhere in the article, usually at the end.

The best way to prevent close paraphrasing is to understand clearly when it is a problem, how to avoid it, and how to address it when it appears.

8 0

3 years ago

Arguably the skills that are most enhanced by taking an AP course are

frozen [14]

Why be gooodnif ur bad