Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
Answer:
It gives a description.
Explanation:
The three sentences are about a rover. By providing the detail on what it does, it is describing the rover to you.
Answer:D. Stephano and Trinculo referring to Caliban as their pet monster.
Explanation:
Caliban is an animal-like creature in Shakespeare's <em>the Tempest.</em> When Prospero arrives at the island, he enslaves Caliban and educates him. Caliban, however, remains defiant and his disruptive behavior does not change. Apart from his strange appearance, Caliban curses and hates his master.
In <em>Act II, Scene II</em>, Stephano and Trinculo discuss selling Caliban as an attraction in England for a piece of silver. They refer to Caliban as <em>'a strange fish'.</em> This demonstrates their dominance over Caliban - they act as colonizers who possess him, and have a right to do whatever they want with him:
(Trinculo) ''<em>A strange fish! Were I in England now, as once I was, and had but this fish painted, not a holiday fool there but would give a piece of silver.''</em>
Answer:
g to beat his time from last ye
Explanation:
