Answer:
the company should buy and install the press because the NPV of the project is positive ($73,133.75)
Explanation:
the MACRS 5 year depreciation:
- $375,000 x 20% = $75,000
- $375,000 x 32% = $120,000
- $375,000 x 19.2% = $72,000
- $375,000 x 11.52% = $43,200
- $19,800, since salvage value at year 5 is $45,000
- $0 x 5.76% = $0
salvage value $45,000
total initial investment = $375,000, discount rate = 11%
- cash flow year 1 = {($142,000 - $15,000 - $75,000) x (1 - 34%)} + $75,000 = $109,320
- cash flow year 2 = {($142,000 - $2,000 - $120,000) x (1 - 34%)} + $120,000 = $133,200
- cash flow year 3 = {($142,000 - $2,000 - $72,000) x (1 - 34%)} + $72,000 = $116,880
- cash flow year 4 = {($142,000 - $2,000 - $43,200) x (1 - 34%)} + $43,200 = $107,088
- cash flow year 5 = {($142,000 - $2,000 - $19,800) x (1 - 34%)} + $19,800 + $45,000 = $144,132
the NPV of the project = -$375,000 + $109,320/1.11 + $133,200/1.11² + $116,880/1.11³ + $107,088/1.11⁴ + $144,132/1.11⁵ = $73,133.75
Answer:
in order to support the employees during the transitional phase of change, the hospital could try helping the employees get used to the new changes by maybe adding facilities that they are used to or maybe arrange some colleagues that the employees are familiar with to work with them, so they can get used to the new things with some support by their side.
consequences the hospital May face if they don't support their employees to make them feel more comfortable in their workplace, many of their workers May quit and it would be hard to find new employees and it would be time-consuming to teach the new employees all over again.
another consequence is that if their employees are the ones that make a lot of people want to go to their Hospital community, then losing them may make the people that go to the hospital community to not want to return again and maybe leave a bad review, since the help support care and treatment probably isn't the same.
Answer:
Excessive aggregate demand in relation to an economy's production capacity.
Explanation:
- The demand and the pull is the upward movement in the prices that follows a shortage in supply. As per the economists, they describe it as the too many dollars that are followed by too few goods.
- Thus when the combined demand in the economy strongly is outweighed by the combined supply and thus the prices tend to go up. Hence the excessive increase of the demands pulls up the production capacity.
Answer:
Operating income will be $6,000
Explanation:
The computation of the operating income is shown below:
= Total cost - outsourcing cost
where,
Total cost = Variable cost + fixed cost
Variable cost = Number of microwaves × variable cost per unit
= 500 × $26
= $13,000
And, the fixed cost is $7,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $13,000 + $7,000
= $20,000
And, the outsourcing cost equal to
= Number of microwaves × outsourcing cost per unit
= 500 × $28
= $14,000
So, the net income would be
= $20,000 - $14,000
= $6,000
Answer:
B. The hedge is asymmetric.
Explanation:
Hedging refers to a technique or a mechanism whereby firms and individuals aim for risk reduction, arising out of uncertain and volatile business situations, which may result into a heavy loss.
For example, an exporter entering into a forward contract to eliminate or reduce the risk of arising out of a future situation wherein, future receipts denominated in a foreign currency, receivable at a future date, may be less than same receipts receivable at current spot exchange rate as on today.
Currency hedge ratio depicts the proportion of total exposure which is covered by hedge w.r.t the total exposure itself.
Asymmetrical hedge refers to covering an exposure by an opposite position wherein the chances of earning profits are higher than the losses current position can lead to. Such an hedge would be similar to covering a call option with a put option. Asymmetrical refers to being of dissimilar or non equal size. Here, it refers to the dissimilarity between prospective profits and losses.
Under a perfect hedge, the loss position in a scenario is completely covered i.e 100% by a prospective gain in other situation, with there being negative correlation between the two scenarios such as if scenario 1 yields a profit, scenario 2 would yield a loss and vice versa.
