The details that Ban Ki-moon uses to support his point of view and the purpose of the speech are the sentences that show evidence that his point of view is correct.
<h3>What are these pieces of evidence?</h3>
- Statistical data supporting the point of view.
- Facts that show the relevance of the point of view.
- Tested and proven information about the point of view presented.
Therefore, to find the supporting details of the speech, you must read the entire speech, identify the author's point of view, and look for the evidence that supports that point of view.
This question is incomplete, as you did not show the speech to which it refers. In this case, I can't give you a specific answer, but I hope the above information will help you find your answer.
More information about textual evidence at the link:
brainly.com/question/375033
it is first person as we have the use of 'we' - first person plural
Answer:
1. Anaphora
2. Logos
3. Alliteration
4. Parallelism
Explanation:
Rhetorical devices are the literary devices used in writing to have a lasting effect on the reader and engage the reader in the writing. Anaphora is a rhetorical device in which words are repeated in the beginning of the successive clauses. So, if "May Cause" is repeated in the beginning of each line, it is "Anaphora". Logos is the literary device by which audience is convinced with the help of facts and reasons. So, facts about smoking is logos rhetoric appeal.
Repetition of same letter in the beginning of closely written words in a sentence leads to alliteration. In question 3, we see letter 's' being repeated, making it an example of alliteration.
Parallelism is constructing a sentence with words that are similar in sound, or meter or has similar meaning. Raises and suppresses are forming parallelism in the sentence in question 4.
Answer: 1. though the argument is valid in itself it leaves room to still ask questions. "why didnt you do it before" "how do i know you're not lying" So, to the teacher this argument might seem like more of an excuse. The student might have had full intentions to complete the project last night, but it just so happened to be the one night the internet was down. now, you can put blame on the students lack on time management skills, but as teachers they should look at the bigger picture. What steps led up to the point where the student only had last night to complete a project. It could be that the student has many other responsibilities to take care of. Due to this the argument should be valid, but not excused.
A better argument would be to explain to the teacher what circumstances the student is facing which caused them to only have that night to complete the project. Instead of just giving a surface lever argument dig deep into the moments leading up to this point. If the student has learning disabilities this could also be a great factor in determining why the student decided to work on the project last minute. For example, with ADHD many people tend to just forget things. In some people ADHD makes it mentally draining to do something they dont want to do especially when timed.
Explanation: hope this helps
Answer:
do you got pad let cause the mods hate me rn -_-
Explanation:
