1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
4 years ago
10

Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion?

History
2 answers:
sesenic [268]4 years ago
6 0

The great compromise and the three-fifth compromise involve so much debate and discussion because each state was looking out for its personal interest and needs.

The great compromise addresses the issues of representation  

The great compromise is also referred to as the Connecticut compromise, Sherman compromise or the great compromise of 1787. It’s an agreement that was made between small and large states as to the number of representatives that each state would have under the US constitution, including the legislature.

The agreement was made in 1787. This compromise was the outcome of the debate among the small and large state delegates as to the number of representatives that should come from each state. As a result of the heated debate, two-chamber congress was created.

The house of representatives was also created and its creation was determined by each states population. The great compromise agreement maintained the bicameral legislature. However, the senators to represent each state at the uppers were changed to two.  

The three-fifth compromise sought for more electoral power to the southern states.

At the 1787 constitutional convention, an agreement was reached by state delegates. This agreement is known as the three-fifth compromise. Based on the compromise, for the purpose of taxation and representation, American slaves would be counted as three-fifth of a person.

The three-fifth agreement gave more electoral power to southern states. However, this would not have been the case if the population of slaves were out rightly ignored.

LEARN MORE:

  • Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise brainly.com/question/5339742

KEYWORDS:

  • three-fifth compromise
  • the great compromise
  • delegates
  • american slaves
  • southern states
  • electoral power
Eddi Din [679]4 years ago
3 0

<em><u>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion as Each state was looking out for its personal interests and needs.(c) </u></em>

Further Explanations:

Both the Comprises were presented in the Constitutional Convention of the United States held in 1787 and were centering at the representation of each State in Congress.

“Great compromise” was a compound representative plan that integrated the states through a constitutional convention. The principal motive of the promise was to substitute the “Article of Confederation”. The minor states feared that this would lead to unrestricted dominance of the  big states.They emphasized on equal  representation of each State.  The Compromise created a bicameral legislature in which  representation for “House of Representatives”was based on the populace and two Senators from each State.

“Three-Fifths Compromise”  was the pronouncement presented in the convention conferring to which it was discussed that the slaves should be counted or not.  In the case of tax policy and representation purposes, it was argued  whether slaves should be counted  in the populace figures or not as they were not measured as the citizens of the nation.  The compromise stated that three out of each five slaves will be counted while determining a state's populace and how many seats will  receive in the “House of Representatives”.The conclusion was that three out of each five slaves were reckoned a third more seat was granted  to Southern States in the Congress.

Learn More

1. How did Alexander Hamilton and James madison view the constitution?<u>brainly.com/question/1320793 </u>

2. the differences in the economic development of the mid-Atlantic, New England, and southern colonies can best be attributed to the?<u>brainly.com/question/10776092 </u>

3. what was the main reason joseph Stalin created collective farms? soviet farms were old-fashioned and inefficient. collective farms would create many new jobs. farmland could be turned into industrial land. wasteful crop surpluses would be eliminated? <u>brainly.com/question/381562 </u>

<u> </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History  

Chapter: Great compromise

Keywords: Constitutional Convention, United States, Three-Fifths Compromise, tax  , bicameral legislature, resident, Southern States, Great compromise, Article of Confederation, Congress,House of Representatives,

You might be interested in
During the war, where did African Americans receive the best treatment?
SashulF [63]

Answer:

Military

African Americans who served in the Civil war were treated with inadequate weapons and medical treatments. Though they were treated differently than white people, they were still treated better in the military.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are limitations of Hammurabi's Code as evidence of life in Babylonia
Helen [10]
The Code of Hammurabi can tell us much about ancient Babylonian society, but cannot show us everything.  The law code was written for the audience of Babylonian people in its own day, especially the scribes and officers of the law.  So there are many questions we would have from a distance much later in history that people then would have understood without needing explanation.  The intention of the law code was to inform people of laws and punishments, not to give later generations a full view of the whole of Babylonian life.  The law code was prepared by those in power in the government of Hammurabi -- we don't get any response from the people or indication of how the people then viewed the laws.  And ultimately, the law code is written in a detached, impersonal way -- as legal documents generally are written.  We don't get a feel for the personal lives or feelings of people living at that time in Babylonia.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine that you heard a public speaker talking about how easy it would be for the U.S. to capture Canada from the British in 18
VikaD [51]
Canada, because he feels that the U.S. could have helped in these affairs between them and the British

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an example of cultural diffusion? (1 point) Americans driving cars made in Michigan people in Japan wa
scoundrel [369]
I think it would be Americans celebrating the 4th of July.
btw your profle picture scared me! lol.
6 0
3 years ago
Why might Gillray have depicted the two men differently
avanturin [10]

Answer:

He is trying to show who has power while also trying to build up the British image.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was nativism on the rise?
    8·1 answer
  • Which effects resulted from the Six-Day War? Check all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • How did the Crusades influence European colonization projects?
    7·1 answer
  • PART A: What is the effect of King describing passivity as “sterile” in paragraph 4? A. It contrasts passivity with nonviolence,
    15·2 answers
  • Nicolaus Copernicus challenged established authority when he A. used astrology to promote the science of astronomy B. proposed t
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the punishment of Germany for its role in World War I in the Treaty Of Versailles?
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate the extent to which the development of diverse technologies, industrialization,
    12·1 answer
  • 1: Explain how the government has responded to social movements​
    9·1 answer
  • Who is Craig longsworth
    9·1 answer
  • The Transition Zone has all of the following characteristics except.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!