1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
3 years ago
15

In traditional African slavery, what happened to enslaved people who integrated into the society of their captors? 1. They often

had an opportunity to purchase their freedom. 2. They were generally not allowed to earn wages. 3. They were not allowed to marry. 4. They had few opportunities to improve their social position.
History
2 answers:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A.) They Often had a an opportunity to purchase their freedom.

Explanation: Just got it right on Egde 2020

olga nikolaevna [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Correct Answer:

4. They had few opportunities to improve their social position.

Explanation:

They enslaved people who became free and re-integrated into the society of their captors usually have few opportunities to improve their social position. This could be seen in their agitations for more rights in countries like United States few decades ago.

You might be interested in
Slavery in the United States was ended by the _____.
HACTEHA [7]

Answer: Revolutionary war

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement accurately describes the Persian Wars?
Mila [183]
Pretty sure the answers are A and <span>C.
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Many immigrants to the United States in the late 20th century came from?
atroni [7]

Answer:

europe or Canada...;)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is conflict unavoidable between Israel and Palestines? Why or why not?
Sonbull [250]
Hello there and thank you for joining Brainly, first of all. :)

Coming from a perspective of society and civilians, war is always unavoidable. However, there is a fine line between what is known as war and what conflict would be. And conflict, in most terms, is defined as complications. Complications can be resolved without further action, like war. That is, through discussions and government. 

Throughout history, we've heard of Crusades, and wars between these two unsettling countries. One, however, is struggling through poverty, and one.. well, lets just say is a powerful force. So, to help explain what the issue is between the two countries - both seemingly claim Jerusalem (or the holy land) as theirs. Multiple minor issues have arose between the times, but most of the conflict seems to be in a strip on Palestine's end called "Gaza". Also known as where the two meet for war. Other areas struggle as well, but to sum this all up, civilians live in places where war is going on. That, right there, is war crime. And war crime on both ends since both did not find a solution to their arguments and disputes. Considering residents of both countries live there, that is also a complete disaster. 

So, moving on the question. Because the lack of accurate information has stung everyone, we don't quite know who is the right hand of this argument. Neither do we know under who's ownership the holy land is for sure, and who is sincerely belongs to. 
However, we can say that the dispute is avoidable under a circumstance. That is, to either 
1) Share the holy land, and unite as a state (which would be quite a difficulty considering both are of different religions)
2) Have one take it over (and that won't happen soon, in my view. Both hold is tightly and yearn for it strongly). 

Since both are terribly rare solutions, we can come to the conclusion that the conflict is unavoidable. Both believe it is their right to claim it, and all we can say is: May peace be embedded soon. I really hate seeing headlines that speak of more people dying and no one is doing anything about it. It hurts me greatly. 

I hope this helps you. Of course, this question is based off of a personal point of view. If this was explained it your class, and your instructor gave a direct answer to this question, you should probably trust your teacher because I'm no politician. (soon to be, though)
Please forgive me for any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.

Thank you! :) I enjoyed answering this one.  
6 0
3 years ago
This question is talking about the 4 officers in the George Floyd incident who were involved.
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

The charges against Derek Chauvin, the former officer who kept his knee on Floyd's neck for almost nine minutes, were expanded this week to include the more serious one of second-degree murder.

This was added to charges of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.

The other three officers -- Thomas Lane and J. Alexander Kueng, who helped restrain Floyd, and Tou Thao, who stood nearby -- are charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter.

----------------------------------------

The officer who kept his knee on Floyd's neck was charged with 2nd degree murder, the other three officers were charged with aidnig and abetting second degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree manslaugther.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which of the following was not a serious economic problem undermining the world's economic stability after world war 1
    14·1 answer
  • Andrew Carnegie seemed to be in favor of taxing large estates heavily death. True or False?
    8·1 answer
  • Una pregunta en ingles con la palabra van
    14·1 answer
  • What does the uniformity of Indus Valley cities tell us about their government?
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Should child labor laws be changed to<br> protect child farm workers?
    14·1 answer
  • What primary motivating pressure (emotions, social pressures, or self-preservation) does the ad's creator use in this commercial
    10·1 answer
  • When the United States' use of military force is successful in maintaining national security, the United States is able to
    10·1 answer
  • Why did people first wanted to settle in england?
    8·1 answer
  • In his first inaugural address, Roosevelt said, "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." What did he mean?
    13·2 answers
  • What is one possible reason silphium disapperar
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!