B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
Answer:
D: too much gaming can affect a students grades
Explanation:
"As long as students know when to stop playing"
The arugument given discusses time when it says "when to stop playing". This means that the argument talks more about how much time should be spent on gaming and nothing about the affects that gaming has on students. Because of this, we need to make sure the supporting sentence discusses time, which it does.
Option C also discusses time but the sentence reads "Teachers need to understand the downfall of over-gaming", the argument we were given talks about how the students need to know, not the teachers.
Answer:
Frantic activity is the correct answer.
Explanation:
