Answer:
A) Korematsu v. United States was a case during World War 2. Fred Korematsu refused to report to an assembly center. He was convicted in a federal district court for violating the military order. Korematsu appealed his conviction arguing that the exclusion of Japanese Americans constituted a race based classification, that violated the equal protection cost.
B) The author has a strong belief in civil liberties tied to the First Amendment, that every American has the freedom of religion, speech, press, right to assemble and right to petition the government. The author is trying to say that no American should be stripped for their rights.
C) During World War 1 the US passed the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918. This law prohibited Americans right to use the First Amendment. The US banned criticism of the war and often led to punishments. During this time some immigrants arrested and denied a hearing, and deported because they looked like they supported the Germans.
Explanation:
I got a 95% on this.
Answer:
the decision of the Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States? Immigrants to the United States are consistently denied equal protection under the law. A person's best protection from persecution rests with the Supreme Court.
the answer is b i think this is wrong cause I picked a random answer so don't listen to me
<span>1933 Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC)
...1933 Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA)
...1933 Public Works Administration (PWA) ...
1933 Civil Works Administration (CWA) ...
1935 Works Progress Administration (WPA) ...
1935 National Youth Administration (NYA) ...
1933 Emergency Banking Relief Act (EBRA) ...
<span>1933 Glass-Steagall Act.
To name a few</span></span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
It seems like the best since Douglas did argue that each territory should be able to choose if they want slavery or not within their borders I believe
