I think technology should be allowed in sports.
Technology can detect cheating, can decide scores, and can evaluate player performance better than any human can. It can keep track of scores better than a human as a human can forget. A human can even miss points. Technology can detect if you scored or not, making it even more efficient and accurate. It can detect the speed of the ball or the speed of the runner. Sports and technology go hand in hand and the pros outnumber the cons.
I dont see any examples but one shared belife was freedom equlity and the bill of rights jope it helps
The 5 examples of passive sentences are :
- Rose tree in our garden was planted by grandpa.
- Gravity was discovered by Newton.
- A clay doll was being made by her.
- Houses are built by Rajat.
- Wonderful poetries were written by Wordsworth.
<h3>What is passive sentences?</h3>
A passive sentence is a sentence in which the subject does not perform the action of the verb. In fact, in a passive sentence, the action of the verb occurs with the subject.
Two voices are written: active and passive. In the active voice, the subject acts as the subject of the sentence, as in Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. Active voice is direct, clear and easy to read. In the passive voice, a topic is discussed, for example, "Neil Armstrong walked on the moon."
A passive sentence is almost the opposite of an active sentence, because the object of the verb (the recipient of the action) moves to the previous position and the subject (the doer of the action) moves to the end (usually "with". " clause).Below is a model: Object "to be" Verb (optional "half" clause).
To learn more about passive sentences, refer;
brainly.com/question/26448743
#SPJ4
Periodically throughout recorded history, puzzling instances of psychiatric and neurologic symptoms have presented en mass<span>: outbursts of thrashing and screaming, or je rky spasms and abrupt vocal tics affecting a group of individuals at once and often attributed to causes like possession, witchcraft, and malingering. Such occurrences of so-called "mass hysteria" continue to confound the medical community, but growing experience has improved the understanding and approach to these seemingly contagious psychogenic events. </span>
