1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
8

Who started democracy

History
1 answer:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
7 0
<span>Cleisthenes founded democracy</span>
You might be interested in
World War One left an indelible mark on European and World History, after reading the article on Verdun what technologies create
victus00 [196]
  • World War I was a war that differed from all others before it, in terms of scale, technology and scope. New technologies such as the tank and the use of chemical weapons were developed during this war, which led to the implementation of trenches as a way to avoid such methods. However, the use of trenches made it difficult for battles to be decisive, leading to a lengthening of the war and a stalemate that led to many casualties.
  • European societies were able to wage war on this scale because most of them were empires. They had colonies overseas that were very profitable, and protected from the war. This allowed countries to have a constant influx of wealth that allowed the fight to continue.
  • The impact on European society was massive. The war killed an entire generation of men in many areas of Europe. It also led to animosity between Germany and other countries. Finally, it also encouraged the development of a nihilistic and hedonistic youth during the 1920s.
  • The Treaty of Versailles that ended the war can be strongly linked to the beginning of World War II. Many scholars believe that the terms of the treaty were too harsh to Germany. This created resentment among the German people and government, as well as an economic crisis. These growing problems were used by the Nazi Party to encourage support for the Nazi regime.
4 0
3 years ago
What did the emperor Constantine’s edict of Milan grant?
Black_prince [1.1K]
A) Religious Freedom
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unlike the New England colonies, the Middle colonies: A. let settlers freely practice their own religions. B. were founded mostl
maria [59]

Answer:

A. let settlers feely practice their own religions.

Explanation:

the middle colonies contained an assortment of religious groups. Such as, Presbyterian church, Quaker meetinghouse, Jewish synagogue, etc.

7 0
3 years ago
Summarize how the city of Philadelphia was impacted by the Flu.
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

The close quarters in the city cause higher outbreaks of flu and other viruses with an open port others can also easily bring in a virus that is why it effects them heavy

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Would you say that the queen was a strong are weak person
    12·1 answer
  • How did feudalism impact the social life of Europeans?
    15·1 answer
  • Name two events from jewish history that reflect the israelites' belief that god had a plan for the people of israel
    12·2 answers
  • What inmformation did presidant truman keep from stalin at the potsdam conferance?
    11·1 answer
  • Administration of the virginia property owners' association act comes under the
    6·1 answer
  • What fear does Madison express in this passage?
    11·2 answers
  • How many major tribes were forced to move west because of th indian removsl act of 1830?
    8·1 answer
  • What are two unique details about the american revolution?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is false about the church during the Middle Ages?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Sojourner Truth describe her life as an African American woman?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!