Hello. You didn't show the map or say what kind of map the question is referring to, which makes it impossible for the question to be answered. However, I can help you by showing you what data you can see on different types of maps.
On physical maps you can see data on the relief of a region, data on the distribution of cities in a region and data on the existence of rivers, caves, mountains, forests and other elements that can compose that region.
On economic maps you can see data related to the economic activities of a region, data on the establishment and distribution of trade in a region and you can see statistical data on the economically active population in the region.
In demographic maps you can look at migration data, data about the spatial distribution of people in a region and you can analyze rates (illiteracy, birth, mortality, among others).
On political maps you can see data about the geographic borders of a country, or cities and states, data about the extension of territories, and data about political borders.
In historical maps you will be able to observe data about an event that was established during a period of time, data that portray the distribution of territories in a region and data of colonial advance in the continents.
The answer is a
As when the forest has been cleared there is nothing to reduce the amount of rain from hitting the soil, the rain washes away all the nutrients and sometimes even soil.
Hope this helps
It could have pros because it may be a better technique, and helps you get more of what you want, but it could also have cons, because it could give back less than what you got with the other technique. This is like if you have a job filing paperwork, and you have a good technique or tool to help you along quickly, but you decide to try something new, and end up being able to get things done faster. However, you might decide to change your techniques again, and you may find that it gets things done much slower. Hope this helps.
Answer:
flood well I think this is the answer
Answer:
Full question is attached.
Tommy's reasoning is wrong because the hypotenuse is not 5 feet.
A skateboard ramp resembles a right angles triangle so its sides resemble that of a right angled triangle.
The height of 3 feet would be the height of the triangle.
The length of 5 feet would be the length of the triangle.
The piece of plywood that would cover the top of the frame would be the hypotenuse.
In using the Pythagoras rule, the c is the hypotenuse but Tommy made the mistake of assuming that the hypotenuse was b which is where the error came from.
Instead of solving for b, they should have been solving for c which is the hypotenuse.
a² + b² = c²
3² + 5² = c²
9 + 25 = c²
c² = 34
c = √34
c = 5.83 feet
They should use a plywood of 5.83 feet not 4 feet.
